24 Comments

  1. Baldev Negi says:

    thanks a lot sir…

  2. As an Engineer, I appreciate the person(s) who derived F0 value from first order reaction. Fedegari paper on F0, almost, presents the full derivation and underlying assumptions. This made our life a bit noncomplicated.

    Though F0 value is arrived considering sterility and PNSU (SAL is a bit immature compared to PNSU, which I will explain later), they are treated exclusively, in practice.

    Consider an example of sterilizing (making life form absent) a known contamination of a vial of 10 cfu with D value of 1. If you expose that to saturated steam of 121.1 deg C, for a minute, there is one log reduction and two log reduction in two minutes. Technically, this leaves 0.1 cfu from an initial level of 10 cfu. This is a bit absurd as no life form exists in a decimal form. So it is already sterile and we are safe.

    However, if the load is of 10 such vials, the final level will be 0.1 cfu in all 10 vials after two minutes or by probability of all vials except 0.1 of 10 vials are sterile, which is 1. In simple terms, assume that after one minute, 1 log quantity of vials got sterile and that leaves 1 vial with 10 cfu and then second minute reduces the load by one log, so you have left with 1 vial of 1 This is why I said PNSU is better concept than SAL.

    Why 10^-6 then? This seems to be fascination of western world for a million. Consider a load of million cfu of million vials or million cfu vial in million operations. Such huge number can be a universal set of all possibilities in real life.

    Why I said that as a universal set is evident from validation of sterilization cycle. If you take standard culture of GBST of 10^6 (somewhere between 5 to 6 but I said 6 to simplify), for SAL of 10^-6, you need to sterilise till F0 is 24 considering D value of 2. Usually the cycle is run for standard 15 minutes and then tested. Why this result comes out to be valid is because you have 6 log reduction in twelve minutes, which means all the life form got killed.

    The entire fundamental, thus, is not very logical but extra safe for all the redundancies built in. At least, far better than the sampling rule of (N)1/2

    1. Thanks, Ravi for your valuable input. You’ve almost reached there. There’s a thin line between logic and assurance. Though you have discussed this here unbiased. More power to you 🙂

  3. Thank you so much for giving me the opportunity to learn something deeply about f0 value.. If you kindly tell me that is there any acceptance criteria or standard f0 value for autoclave or DHS validation? That means how I understand that our autoclave is going well or not in respect to f0 value. May be I am asking a stupid question or from very little basic but if you reply then some confusion would vanish from my mind. Thanks again.

  4. Sandeep Kadam says:

    Nice article. Thanks sir!

  5. Collins Jones says:

    I just spent the morning reading your articles – I teach a biomanufacturing course at a 2-year college – these are awesome explanations! Thank you! Any chance you could cover viral clearance and validation of chromatography systems (we have 4 AKTA Avants).
    Thank you again! Best!

    1. Glad this article helped you, Collins. I guess I can cover in a separate article. You see, this is already a big article covering design aspects of the RP-HPLC. 🙂

  6. Glenn McCall says:

    Thanks so much! This article helped me a lot! I had a quick question; if equivalent exposure time increases exponentially with temperature, why are autoclaves not run slightly higher? If the autoclave was run at 124.1 ℃ vs 121.1 ℃ for the same amount of time, the exposure for the cycle at 124.1 ℃ would almost be double the 121.1 ℃ cycle. Am I thinking about this in the wrong way?

    1. Thanks, Glenn! Your thinking is absolutely correct. We look specifically at consistency in steam temperature at the point of use and moisture content at that temperature. Then, we can finalize the temperature setpoint backed by the said data.

  7. Shivajikumar says:

    Thank you sir for such nice explaination, can you explain the same for tunnel sterilization. Depyrogenation hold time .

  8. Anil reddy says:

    Hi, what an excellent article … Kudos this clears all my doubts. Can you write similar article about AO value for washer disinfector..

  9. Malu Avane says:

    Big big thanks dear sir for sharing this. It’s better explained. God bless you!

  10. Thank you a lot. I liked this post. Now I’ve no doubt about D, Z, and F0 value concept.

  11. Ranjeet Das says:

    Hi Saket. I found this article via LinkedIn. I am very impressed with the quality of the write-up. It is pretty easy to understand at the same time informative.

  12. Manisha B. says:

    Because of examples, it was easy to understand D, Z and F0 value concept.

  13. This article clearly explains the significance of F0 value in steam sterilization.Thanks for explaining it clearly.

    1. Hey Nikki! Glad that this added value to your know-how. More such content in pipeline. Stay tuned and take care 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *